PDA

View Full Version : Lloyd Pye - Amazing New Starchild Skull DNA Results



Scott
16th March 2012, 23:12
March 16th 2012

3508
Lloyd Pye has come out with some new results from the DNA testing of the Starchild Skull that reinforces the theory that absolute proof can be obtained that the Starchild Skull in NOT Human.

In this YouTube Audio Update Lloyd tell us the results of those latest tests and what it means to the overall discovery that the Starchild skull is Alien in origin.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVI2FrMuM4o


Lloyd's Starchild Skull Update Details: http://www.starchildproject.com/dna2012.htm

Our previous Interviews with Lloyd Pye:

November 01 2011 Lloyd Pye - Intervention Theory Essentials - Human Origins (http://www.spectrumradionetwork.com/Archive/lloyd-pye-intervention-theory-essentials-human-origins.html)

December 07 2010 Lloyd Pye - Human Origins & Starchild Skull Update (http://www.spectrumradionetwork.com/Archive/lloyd-pye-human-origins-a-starchild-skull-update.html)

Scott

sandy
17th March 2012, 00:29
Thanks Scott,

I read the essay a while back so it was good to hear Lloyd's excitement and yours too :) Me too and I can hardly wait to hear the end results although I don't expect it will be any time too soon :(

Scott
17th March 2012, 01:20
Lloyd Pye's most recent newsletter.

Anthropology breakthrough creates many questions.


"I have never received more comments about a news story...."

....than the one about the "Red Deer Cave" skulls and other bones that were recently announced in China.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17370170

As the article makes clear, these are not human bones. In every way they are the skulls of primates, with heavy brow ridges, wide cheekbones, flat faces, wide noses, prognathous jaws, and no chin. Perfect hominoid faces (like we would expect to find with Bigfoot, Almas, Yeti, or Agogwes) on bipedal bodies, but living in the range of only 12,000 to 13,000 years ago.

This date creates an enormous problem for mainstream scientists. They MUST find a way to classify these beings as some kind of aberrant humans, or they would have to face the obvious fact that these are the bones of hominoids (bipedal, hair-covered primates), which would immediately shove humans off the flow-chart of life on Earth. That would drive a spear through the heart of human evolution, and cause a nuclear meltdown in mainstream ranks!!!

This is the same problem they faced with the Hobbits of Indonesia. Remember those? The little dwarf-sized bipeds that also looked entirely non-human? Yet they, too, lived well within the cut-off point for so-called "prehumans," the last of the Neanderthals at around 28,000 years ago. And keep in mind that the Neanderthals have skulls much more like both the Red Deer Cave people and the Hobbits. Neanderthals were nothing like humans as we are today.

This problem is what created the infamous "Missing Link," a mystery hominid that is often touted as being found, but never really is. There is NO possible "transition" species between Neanderthals and humans because the change in our cranial structure is so profound. Every single aspect is different. There are NO areas of direct, perfect corollary. Just as that is true with the Starchild Skull. There is not a single corollary with a human skull....NOT ONE!

So the Red Deer Cave people are another form of Hobbit, and they will be treated the same. A way will be found to shoehorn them into the "human" category, where they will fit as well as chimps or gorillas might, and as the Hobbits have been forced to do. This is so science doesn't have to face up to the possibility that humans are recent arrivals on Earth, not part of the native species, and that we might actually have been genetically engineered!!!

[Those who want to know more about the idea that we humans were in fact engineered to be here on Earth, please check my heavily illustrated eBook about it, "Intervention Theory Essentials." Well worth anyone's time!]

http://www.lloydpye.com/interventionebook.html

Scientists have gotten away with the Hobbit farce because Hobbits happen to be examples of the dwarf kind of hominoid that inhabits the band of jungles that circle the equator of the Earth. That is their natural habitat, and on the island of Flores, where they were found, the local name for the hair-covered pygmy primate that lives in the jungle is "Ebu Gogo." Wherever hominoids are found, they have a local name applied by the natives that are aware of them and treat them like any other creature sharing their environment.

The problem with the Red Deer Cave people is that they are more human sized, so the "dwarf deformed human" label to explain away Hobbits will not fly with the new discovery. It will have to be some other form of nonsense that will be foisted off as truth so this new problem can be swept under the mental rug of most people, along with the Hobbits.


Speaking of the Starchild Skull....

We're doing great with new interest on several fronts since the annoucement of the fragment recovered from its FOXP2 gene. If you have not read the essay about this yet, you really should. It's 4,000 words and is available at:
http://www.starchildproject.com/dna2012.htm. Takes 20 minutes to read.

But the new news is found in this article:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/mar/13/nasa-astronauts-eyeballs-deformed-space

It talks about the discovery that in all astronauts who spend extended time in space, they come back to Earth with noticeable distortion in the rear of their eye sockets, which changes the quality of their vision! This is a fascinating result of long-term exposure of humans in space, but it also applies to the Starchild Skull. One of its most noticeable features is the extreme shallowness of its eye sockets, making them absolutely nothing like human eye sockets, yet they are stunningly symmetrical and therefore meant to be built as they are.

sandy
17th March 2012, 02:15
Hi Scott,

Thanks for posting this interesting news about the Red Deer Cave people. I have read a little about it but this article sure gave me a greater understanding as to the significance of this find. I too wonder how they will distort it to fit the present scientific paradigm.

Read the article about the astronauts a few days ago but the dot connecting with the star child is an eye opener for sure.

Thanks again for posting :)