the ARTIFICIAL MOON and spiritual implications

[Fred Steeves]

Fred,
What information do you think I dismissed?
Im just questioning the direction it was focused.

Dunno magamud, I never saw that you refuted any evidence Icke presented or why, just that you lumped him in with Shaw because of a quote. I read the book, did you?

Cheers,
Fred

[reaver]

Its not outside of yourself, nor just inside, its both. Relativity and quantum fluctuations playing a harp if I may be so predisposed. Its Idols to me frankly and they each have a heart.

Aye, also that which is within can change that which is without and vice versa. This image pops in my mind:

http://www.sgeier.net/fractals/fractals/07/Infinity.jpg

Image is too large to attach... make sure to zoom in.

[magamud]

Dunno magamud, I never saw that you refuted any evidence Icke presented or why, just that you lumped him in with Shaw because of a quote. I read the book, did you?

Cheers,
Fred

Fred Ideas and the people with them are taking shape with new information. Should you not be concerned by the Quote that leads his paper?

If I had not read the book, does that give us nothing to discuss?

---------- Post added at 19:29 ---------- Previous post was at 19:27 ----------

Aye, also that which is within can change that which is without and vice versa. This image pops in my mind:

http://www.sgeier.net/fractals/fractals/07/Infinity.jpg

Image is too large to attach... make sure to zoom in.

I got dizzy looking at it lol. Its harmonics, its multiple strings plucked at certain times, that gives it resonance....

---------- Post added at 19:33 ---------- Previous post was at 19:29 ----------

Even if the moon is the Death star, the physics will remain the same. So in a sense, beside our perspective what will change?

[Krystic]

I see people are not looking deeply enough or not prpeared to..can't see the forest for the trees..

the false "god" matrix doesn't seem to compute for many..spiritual architecture effects everything...oh well..more to think about here

Researcher from Cornell confirms; moon orbit is “anomoulous”
Feb 28, 2011 5:50pm by Elle D'Coda

Cornell University associate Lorenzo Lorio, has researched and written a paper confirming observations made by many -- that the moon's orbit has become erratic. I've been following this story for several months, having noticed genuine irregularities...wondering if and when we'd hear from the scientists. Well, here's one brave soul from Cornell.

Quote: "On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon. The present-day models of the dissipative phenomena occurring in the interiors of both the Earth and the Moon are not able to explain it. A recent analysis ( Prior1st Feb 2011 (Netlethe) ) of a Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data record spanning 38.7 yrs, revealed an anomalous increase of the eccentricity of the lunar orbit.

A potentially viable Newtonian candidate would be a trans-Plutonian massive object (Planet X/Nemesis/Tyche) since it, actually, would affect e with a non-vanishing long-term variation. " Unquote.
more on the story here
http://enviromonitor.amplify.com/201...is-anomoulous/

[Jenci]

The Moon is a Spacecraft
David Icke | Excerpt from the book:
Human Race Get off Your Knees ? The Lion Sleeps No More
(David Icke Books, 2010. ISBN: 0955997313.) 2,647 views
January 16, 2012


I don?t know if there are men on the moon, but if there are they must be using the earth as their lunatic asylum. ? George Bernard Shaw.

Hi Mags,



I found this in the same book by Icke, p477 under a heading of Calculated Mass Murder :-

He [Francis Galton] was supported by members of the Illuminati Fabian Society, like writers George Bernard Shaw and Bertrand Russell, and founders Sydney and Beatrice Webb. Shaw defended Hitler's race policies and avocated using lethal gas to kill those who couldn't 'justify their existence'.The Fabian university, the London School of Economics, became a stronghold of eugenics.

Jeanette

[Anno]

Two things:

Re The Moon. The official theory on how the moon got there is far less believable than the theory that it is artificial. There are just too many coincidences and anomalies about the moon for me to accept that it is a natural object that belongs to our planet. The problem I see is that when Icke attaches himself to ideas he discredits them by association because of the whole Reptilian thing. He basically took what he wanted from the Artificial Moon works to provide evidence for his Reptilians. His main source 'Who Built the Moon' actually argues against Icke's view but he leaves those parts out. We should remember that Icke is a researcher and all his moon ideas are taken from earlier sources that (most of which) can be found in his bibliography. I suggest people look to those and other sources. Many many people have pondered the Moon for a long time and there's definitely something artificial about it.

Re people like Shaw. There are many people that we are told are evil by the youtube gurus. There's a reason for that. Yes they had lots of harsh ideas that none of us could support but they also provide profound insights and very valuable knowledge. My own personal view on this is that I'll read anyone and use my own discernment as to what parts I keep. As they say, even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day. As an on topic example, if anyone has a copy of Icke's really early books you can find him talking about channeling entities that in later books he says are the same evil overlord entities that guide the powers that be. Noone is perfect so consider everything, believe nothing and use your discernment.

[Krystic]

Icke is just one of many who have researched the moon anomolies...try sticking to the facts of the anomolies and try not avoiding those facts by character assassinations...on top of the many factual anomolies of it's very presence in our skies,many people are noticing very weird moon phenomena NOW..it's shifting orbit,disappearing etc,etc

I see people are not looking deeply enough or not prepared to..can't see the forest for the trees..

the false "god"(love is all you need) matrix doesn't seem to compute for many..spiritual architecture effects everything...oh well..more to think about here

Researcher from Cornell confirms; moon orbit is “anomoulous”
Feb 28, 2011 5:50pm by Elle D'Coda

Cornell University associate Lorenzo Lorio, has researched and written a paper confirming observations made by many -- that the moon's orbit has become erratic. I've been following this story for several months, having noticed genuine irregularities...wondering if and when we'd hear from the scientists. Well, here's one brave soul from Cornell.

Quote: "On the anomalous secular increase of the eccentricity of the orbit of the Moon. The present-day models of the dissipative phenomena occurring in the interiors of both the Earth and the Moon are not able to explain it. A recent analysis ( Prior1st Feb 2011 (Netlethe) ) of a Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) data record spanning 38.7 yrs, revealed an anomalous increase of the eccentricity of the lunar orbit.

A potentially viable Newtonian candidate would be a trans-Plutonian massive object (Planet X/Nemesis/Tyche) since it, actually, would affect e with a non-vanishing long-term variation. " Unquote.
more on the story here
http://enviromonitor.amplify.com/201...is-anomoulous/

[flower]

Krystic.. if i may suggest...

That living by example is better then pointing your view at people.

try sticking to the facts of the anomolies and try not avoiding those facts by character assassinations.

You bring good information here... your negative lunges at people are doing you a disservice.

I have felt you have judged my words/actions based on your perceived definition of my charector in the past.. why may i ask is that action not applicable to Ikce then?

[Anno]

Icke is just one of many who have researched the moon anomolies

I know, I said that in my post. And please don't accuse me of character assasination. What I said is the result of my own research. It is all true and verifiable. Character assasination is when you make stuff up. If you think I did that then please point it out and I can point you to the evidence.

And for the record, in his interviews Icke said the idea of the moon being false was beamed in to his head. It was only after this that he went to Amazon and found Who Built the Moon and Mysterious Spaceship Moon. Both of which are now artificially overpriced as a result. I should know because I made ?40 profit selling my copy of Who Built... Nice one Dave. =]

[Krystic]

yeah,you have done the same to me and so many other members in this forum Celine...try looking at this as a thread about the artificial moon and not about david icke and you may add something worthwhile to this thread...I know you need the drama..ask yourself why.This thread is about the artificial moon FACTS.

Look at the FACTS in this thread...what you want to say about Icke is irrelevant to the topic of this thread...look at the FACTS and the implications...too much?///drop the drama stick to the topic...look at the FACTS icke presents...you may not agree with the theory he builds aroundthem..but the facts are facts

[flower]

no i wanted to say sonmething about you..but you are corrrect its off topic..

and yes i have done that a lot....at least i am learning from it

[Anno]

My fact is that the reason most people are ignoring this info on the Moon is simply because Icke is the most well known proponent of it and I'm asking people to look past that. What's wrong with that? It's not like I'm the only person who's ever said that. Remember 'turd in the punchbowl'? Anyway, If you don't mind me saying, Krystic, you come across as very hostile and it puts me off bothering with you and your threads. Let's all relax shall we. We can disagree without falling out. =]

To lighten the mood, here's my favourite David Icke joke... David Icke is the ultimate X-Man. Ex-Footballer, Ex-Journalist, Ex-Tv Presenter, Ex-Poltician, two Ex-Wives and a can of Extra-strength lager. Badum tisshhhhh. =] *awaits rotten tomatoes*

[Fred Steeves]

And for the record, in his interviews Icke said the idea of the moon being false was beamed in to his head. It was only after this that he went to Amazon and found Who Built the Moon and Mysterious Spaceship Moon.

Well Anno, I don't recall him ever actually using terminology like "was beamed into my head", and it was Google he went to seeking any corroborating information, not Amazon. But putting the petty semantics shit aside, so what if an idea or a vision of something DID just pop into his head one day?

Something similar happened to me just last evening standing in my back yard watching the Florida sunset wind up it's evening performance. That sort of thing probably happens to a lot of us here, but we aren't always eager to go public with our little personal aha moments.

I know you want Icke debunked, and that's fine, but you can do better than that. You know I love you man, I'm just sayin.

[Fred Steeves]

Krystic, jeez!!! I happen to agree with a lot of stuff you bring to the table here. You're obviously very intelligent and very well informed, but you need to just chill the fuck out bro, and show people a little bit of respect. Especially the ladies for chrissake...

[Krystic]

Jeez Fred...how am I not showing respect here ..and why do you think Ladies deserve more respect than men...lol..and again,this has nothing to do with this thread,Anno,how was what I said hostile,it was honest and direct..,I.m about to leave this forum because of so much drama and so little substance or discussion I find interesting ..

send me a personal message if you like...back to topic please..

THE ARTIFICIAL MOON FACTS...go to page one in this thread,my first post and look at the FACTS

[Krystic]

more facts suppporting the artificial moon theory...come on people put the facts together...try to drop the conditioning...wake up and think about the implications of this

Lunar Nano Soil - More Evidence of Alien Engineering?
by Zen Gardner

This should add some more fuel to the artificial moon argument. Could this curious find be more proof our moon is not natural, but manufactured? Let this broaden your horizons.

Any way you look it, this has some remarkable information about our amazing Universe that’s unfolding before us.

Nanoparticles found in moon glass bubbles explain weird lunar soil behaviour
View a 3D image from inside the lunar bubble using transmission X-Ray microscopy. You can see what is inside the lunar bubble with 3D glasses.

“We were really surprised at what we found,” Dr Zbik said.

“Instead of gas or vapour inside the bubbles, which we would expect to find in such bubbles on Earth, the lunar glass bubbles were filled with a highly porous network of alien-looking glassy particles that span the bubbles’ interior.

Advertisement
Privacy | Remove Ads“Alien-looking glassy particles”. Interesting choice of words, wouldn’t you say?

“It appears that the nanoparticles are formed inside bubbles of molten rocks when meteorites hit the lunar surface. Then
continued here http://beforeitsnews.com/story/2259/...gineering.html